I use 'image-backup' to create and update backups on my RPi systems. This includes an RPi4 running 'bullseye Lite', and an RPi5 running 'bookworm Lite'. The RPi5/'bookworm Lite' system also uses an NVME card.
I use the same script to perform the 'image-backup' updates on both RPi4 & RPi5. Just for grins, I recently added a line to the update script for the purpose of calculating the elapsed time. I was a bit surprised by the results:
RPi5 update image runs in the range of 193 - 240 seconds
RPi4 update image runs in the range of 22 - 31 seconds
I knew the 'bookworm Lite' image would be a bit larger, but figured this would be offset by 2 things: NVME speed, and processor speed.
Any thoughts on why this might be?
I use the same script to perform the 'image-backup' updates on both RPi4 & RPi5. Just for grins, I recently added a line to the update script for the purpose of calculating the elapsed time. I was a bit surprised by the results:
RPi5 update image runs in the range of 193 - 240 seconds
RPi4 update image runs in the range of 22 - 31 seconds
I knew the 'bookworm Lite' image would be a bit larger, but figured this would be offset by 2 things: NVME speed, and processor speed.
Any thoughts on why this might be?
Statistics: Posted by irishmonk-57 — Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:47 am